🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.