🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by mediators to reopen talks with the US government. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a complex path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a position of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Earlier Talks Abruptly Ended

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states exercised their privilege to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that American atomic experts could function inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Diplomats stated on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative the American negotiator only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Iranian officials stated the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations reopen.

The US president in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He said the strikes began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Answer

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their desires during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and stays the primary solution to resolve disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will obtain a response in the identical tone."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the face of this assault."