🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor may be the ideal pick for a daring scary movie about the biblical figure, though not for the reasons certain audiences might assume. Truthfully, Cage does not even portray the central religious figure in The Carpenter’s Son: his character is credited simply as a craftsman. The actor is positioned as the Joseph in this tale, working to keep his religious convictions as The Boy (portrayed by the young actor), their teenage adopted son, starts to exhibit miraculous gifts. The reason it’s difficult to imagine any other major actor taking this character is that while the figure grows burdened with numerous challenges, Nicolas Cage looks nearly touchingly confident that the gloomy, grim feature is a valuable project.

The Actor's Latest Career Choices

Nicolas Cage has been using his time more judiciously lately. He continues to does more films than the majority of average viewers may ever watch — for example, did you know that the man has made three separate frontier films recently? — yet he also includes high-profile independent films like one recent hit, another notable movie, and Longlegs. This new film seems like in that category, because it’s genre-adjacent, possibly controversial, and approaches a exaggerated premise quite seriously.

Movie's Premise and Handling

Regrettably, writer-director the director does not reward that serious attention. The Carpenter’s Son starts from a interestingly wandering place, presented as based on an obscure religious text concerning the youthful days of the messiah. The Carpenter, The Mother, and their child relocate constantly, afraid of faith-based hostility or suspicion over The Boy’s strange powers. “Calamity follows us,” Cage mournfully notes. That continues when dark forces focus on the family in their latest settlement, initiating with that familiar Biblical temptation for The Boy.

Sometimes, the film mirrors an demonic possession-type supernatural thriller, except that none of the main figures are explicitly taken over. Instead, they are progressively isolated mutually, while these entities affect a resident female (the actress, credited as an outsider) who the son connects to, and presents each character unsettling premonitions of a dark tomorrow. Cage's role notably grapples with his place in this story, sometimes chastising the son he doesn't completely grasp.

Controversy and Caution

This material is likely to court controversy, and the director handles it with plenty of delicacy — overly, perhaps. The idea of a young man dealing with his eventual sacrifice and seduced by unknown powers is indeed terrifying, but the filmmaker could be wary of appearing sensational and eager to signal his goals, therefore he regularly retreats into gloomily threatening cinematography. The roles brood incessantly — FKA Twigs, who demonstrated notable talent in another movie, of all things — yields her role to her Mother Mary cloak, occasionally interrupted by some gruesome scary visuals.

The Star's Performance and Movie's Shortcomings

Meanwhile, the actor dabbles in just the sort of overacting that his more snickering appreciators could be expecting. An instance (also included) in previews where he loses control and shouts “My belief is broken!” If that kind of theatrical release is part of a religious scary film, possibly a more openly absurd approach would be more effective of the actor's readiness to go over the top as required. On the other hand, the film is closer to the weaker direct-to-video movies he starred in through much of that period — not the cheesy thrillers so much as the dramas and ghost stories that typically appear interesting, and usually have a few choice memorable scenes, but in the end seem like, frankly, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.

Honestly, a number of those, although simpler, were more watchable as a whole. Here is where I must break my own dogma, not spiritual but career-related: Long ago, an admired senior convinced me to banish adjectives like “boring” or “dull” from my film-criticism vocabulary. Such terms express scant but a personal and vaguely expressed impatience, withdrawing from the task of clearly expressing the mental and feeling of viewing a specific film. It’s difficult to communicate monotony without appearing dull personally. It's equally vague as calling a movie “engaging.” “Explain further,” essentially.

Yet, I acknowledge, I grew weary during much of The Carpenter’s Son. To the movie’s non-exploitative credit, it’s a devotional type of stultification, not for The Carpenter’s Son is moralizing, but as it requires a type of dutiful submission to sit through it. At some point in the beginning, the movie locks into a cyclic tempo of simmering anguish, and never really