🔗 Share this article

"Half of my life is archived on the platform, and unexpectedly they demand us to pay for it."

One-star ratings and a perception of inequity have dominated online discussion since the app became the latest digital platform to introduce fees for a function that users previously enjoyed using for free.

The company behind Snapchat declared in September that it would require payment from subscribers if they have more than five GB of archived images and recordings stored as Memories.

Among numerous users, these retro posts function as a glimpse into earlier times – prompting some to criticize the firm of "profit-driven motives" in posts on social media and negative feedback on digital storefronts.

Available Solutions

The company has compared its paid storage plans to those provided by major companies for handsets.

And as an alternative for individuals avoiding fees, users can download their saved content – which for certain users amount to significant data – to their device.

The company indicated that only a limited group of users would be influenced by the updated terms.

The company admitted that it was "never easy to shift from accessing content at no charge to paying for it" – but suggested it would be "justified by the benefits" for members.

A significant number of criticising the change via digital channels seem to disagree.

User Backlash

An online petition called the fee a "reminiscence fee", with participants labeling it "bleak" and "outrageous" – while one person vowed never to use the platform again.

In parallel, in a poor rating on the app marketplace, a person identifying as a pseudonymous user said it felt "morally questionable".

"If I know millennials right, most of us have extensive archives of recorded experiences on this service," they commented. "Numerous users only remained on the platform mainly for this purpose. Such limited storage is inadequate when you have extensive collections of moments... Goodbye to the app."

Additionally, Guste Ven, a young adult aspiring reporter in London, revealed on TikTok her decision to uninstall the application.

"I concluded that I wanted to export all my saved content as immediately," she explained. "The vast majority of my teenage years have been documented through my saved snaps, all of the images in there are really important to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to introduce fees individuals for something that has been free for so many years."

Unknown Fees

The company has not yet said how much subscription tiers would cost in the Britain – only that they are part of a "phased international launch".

But a young adult Amber Daley, who is based in the capital, commented in a upload on TikTok that she would be "devastated" by such charges.

The user mentioned that the platform had become "integrated into daily routine" since she began accessing it in several years ago.

While she said she accepted the app needed to generate revenue, the user proposed that the saved content option is more valuable than the firm may have realized.

"I think it's a rather unjust move to impose fees on your users who have been faithful and dedicated," she said. "These are not merely labeled 'Memories', these are our actual memories."

Expert Analysis

Firms opting to impose fees from subscribers for a service that was earlier without cost is nothing new, and millions pay for services like digital backup services to preserve their photos and videos from their smartphone.

The fact of keeping information in the online servers – which some in the technology sector like to refer to as essentially "somebody else's computer" – is that it involves expenses.

"Hosting vast amounts of saved content on the platform requires significant resources," social media consultant Matt Navarra stated. "The platform has to attempt to identify a approach to fund the operation of storage, bandwidth, copies, file sharing, data protection – all that stuff."

However Mr Navarra noted that imposing charges for a function that had earlier required no payment, and users had been encouraged to use as such, may seem like a "deceptive practice" for many people.

"Changing the rules after users have created this massive online collection doesn't really sit right," he noted. In the view of countless individuals, he stated, "Archived media exceeds mere information, they're personal mementos."

The sentiment was echoed by those leaving critical reviews, with one person describing their saved images and clips "extremely valuable to me".

"[Memories] have each part of my personal journey within them from celebrations of new family members' births, mourning of passed loved ones, memories with friends/family, [and] my complete adolescence," they wrote.

Research Perspective

A postdoctoral researcher, a research fellow at an educational establishment in the Holland, stated that the company's action highlights the consequences of for-profit services being used to archive sentimental personal content.

"Platforms gain from this confidence, connected relationship, and expectation of continuous entry, which even encourages certain individuals to continue using the app or persist with the feature in order to revisit their stored media," she told journalists. "However these are not benevolent guardians of individual recollection."